Will more members bolster the EU geopolitical clout, increase its internal market to some 500 million and address labor shortages?


It's true that accepting new members could potentially bring several benefits to the EU, but there are also significant challenges to consider. Here's a breakdown of the potential pros and cons:

Potential benefits:

  • Geopolitical clout: A larger EU would have a stronger voice on the global stage, with more weight in areas like trade, security, and climate change.
  • Larger internal market: With a population of around 500 million, the EU's single market would become even more attractive for businesses, potentially boosting economic growth and job creation.
  • Addressing labor shortages: Some EU countries, particularly Germany, face labor shortages in certain sectors. Accepting new members with younger populations could help alleviate this problem.
  • Promoting European values: Expanding the EU could be seen as a way to promote European values like democracy, human rights, and the rule of law.


  • Integration challenges: Integrating new members into the EU's political and economic structures can be a complex and lengthy process. There may be concerns about countries meeting the criteria for membership, such as having a stable democracy and a market-oriented economy.
  • Euroscepticism: There is already some skepticism about the EU in some existing member states. Accepting new members, particularly from countries with different cultures and traditions, could increase these concerns.
  • Distribution of benefits: There may be concerns that the benefits of enlargement would not be evenly distributed, with some countries benefiting more than others. This could lead to tensions within the EU.
  • Institutional reform: The EU's institutions may need to be reformed to accommodate a larger number of member states. This could be a difficult and contentious process.

Who wants to join the EU?

Several countries have expressed interest in joining the EU, including:

  • North Macedonia: Became a candidate country in 2005 and is currently in accession negotiations.
  • Albania: Became a candidate country in 2014 and is currently in accession negotiations.
  • Montenegro: Became a candidate country in 2010 and is currently in accession negotiations.
  • Serbia: Became a candidate country in 2012 and is currently in accession negotiations.
  • Turkey: Has been an official candidate country since 1999, but accession talks are currently stalled.

It's important to note that the EU accession process is long and complex, and it is not guaranteed that any of these countries will eventually join the bloc.

Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to accept new members is up to the existing EU member states. They will need to weigh the potential benefits and challenges carefully before making a decision.

Here are some additional thoughts to consider:

  • The EU is already facing a number of challenges, such as the eurozone crisis, migration, and Brexit. Accepting new members could add to these challenges.
  • The EU may need to reform itself before it can effectively absorb new members.
  • Public opinion in existing EU member states is often divided on the issue of enlargement.

The decision of whether or not to enlarge the EU is a complex one with no easy answers. There are both potential benefits and challenges to consider. Ultimately, the decision will need to be made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the specific circumstances of each candidate country.

I hope this information is helpful! Let me know if you have any other questions.


Popular posts from this blog

What did Iqbal said on capitalism?

"Islam out of Europe", shout the French patriots. Do you agree? Why are they against Islam?

Bretton Woods Agreement and Its Contribution to the US Dollar's Reserve Currency Status